top of page

Why Some People Love Reading And Others Don't

  • 3 days ago
  • 12 min read

Place two people in the same quiet room with an hour to spare and a shelf of books nearby. One may immediately begin examining the titles, read several back covers and settle comfortably into a chair. The other may glance at the same shelf without feeling any particular invitation. They would rather call someone, watch a programme, go for a walk or find something practical to do.



The difference is often treated as a reflection of character. Readers are described as curious, thoughtful and capable of sustained attention. People who do not enjoy books may be assumed to lack patience, imagination or intellectual depth. These conclusions flatter one group while misunderstanding the other.


Reading is valuable, but enjoying it is not a moral achievement.


People arrive at books through very different experiences. Some discovered early that printed words could transport them into another life, answer questions nobody around them could explain or offer privacy in a noisy household. Others encountered reading mainly through comprehension exercises, vocabulary tests, compulsory literature texts and reminders that they were too slow. The same activity became freedom for one person and evaluation for another.


This distinction may be particularly familiar in Singapore, where reading can become closely tied to educational performance. A child may be surrounded by assessment books, model compositions, oral practice and carefully selected titles intended to improve English or Mother Tongue results. None of these purposes is inherently wrong. Yet when every book carries an instructional objective, reading can begin to feel like an extension of school rather than a place to wander.


By adulthood, “I love reading” and “I don’t read” may sound like settled identities. They are often compressed histories.


One person remembers being allowed to choose books that matched their curiosity, even when those choices involved comics, ghost stories, football biographies or the same familiar series repeatedly. Another remembers struggling through texts selected for their supposed value while being told that the books they genuinely enjoyed were too simple, unserious or unsuitable.

The question is therefore not only why some people love reading.


It is what each person has learned to expect when they open a book.



Reading Is Not One Experience

The word “reading” gives the impression of a single activity, but it contains many different experiences. Reading a novel requires something different from following a recipe, understanding a financial article, studying a historical account or working through a technical manual. Someone who dislikes literary fiction may happily spend an evening reading about aviation, interior design, football transfers or political history.



Even within fiction, preferences vary greatly. A reader who becomes absorbed in crime novels may find an acclaimed family saga intolerably slow. Someone who enjoys short essays may struggle to sustain interest across five hundred pages. Another person may appreciate poetry precisely because it rewards attention without requiring a long narrative commitment.


This variety complicates the familiar division between readers and non-readers. Many people read extensively without describing themselves as readers because their preferred material does not resemble the culturally approved image of a book. They consume news analysis, online forums, graphic novels, fan fiction, religious texts, biographies, manuals or long discussions about subjects that matter to them.


Others may own shelves of books and still read relatively little. The identity remains meaningful even when the habit has faded.


What people enjoy is not reading in the abstract. They enjoy a particular reward delivered through reading.


For some, that reward is immersion. For others, it is knowledge, language, emotional recognition, suspense or the quiet satisfaction of understanding something difficult. A person who has not yet encountered the form of reading that offers a reward they value may reasonably conclude that books are not for them.



Ease Changes The Reward

People who read fluently can move through words with relatively little conscious effort. Their attention is available for the argument, character, atmosphere or idea. The physical act of reading recedes, allowing the content to take over.


When reading is slower or more effortful, the experience changes. A person may repeatedly lose the thread of a sentence, reread the same paragraph or reach the bottom of a page without retaining what happened. The book asks for concentration before it provides much pleasure.

This can produce a self-reinforcing difference. People who find reading easier are more likely to do it voluntarily. More reading then expands vocabulary, familiarity and confidence, making future reading easier still. Those who experience greater friction may avoid the activity, giving themselves fewer opportunities for it to become more comfortable.


The result can look like a difference in motivation when it partly began as a difference in effort.

This does not mean everyone who dislikes reading has an undetected difficulty. Tiredness, stress, language familiarity and the complexity of the text can all affect the experience. A highly capable professional may read dense reports throughout the day and have no desire to spend the evening processing another page. Someone may read comfortably in one language but associate another with correction, embarrassment or years of examination pressure.


Reading enjoyment cannot be separated from how much work the reader must perform before the reward begins.




What Reading Came To Represent

People do not respond only to the activity itself. They also respond to what the activity has come to mean.


For one person, reading may represent privacy, discovery and the pleasure of entering a world without interruption. For another, it may represent schoolwork, correction and the expectation to understand something quickly enough to answer questions about it. The book may be different, but the emotional atmosphere around reading can remain surprisingly familiar.


A child who was repeatedly compared with a faster reader may carry forward the belief that reading exposes inadequacy. Someone who was corrected whenever they mispronounced a word may become more focused on avoiding mistakes than following the story. Even a well-intended emphasis on educational value can teach a child that books are tools for improvement rather than objects of pleasure.


This does not mean schools or parents should stop encouraging reading. Access, guidance and practice matter. The difficulty arises when encouragement becomes so closely tied to performance that the reader loses ownership of the experience.


In Singapore, a child may have regular access to school libraries, public libraries and a wide range of books, while still experiencing reading mainly through spelling lists, comprehension passages and recommended titles chosen for academic usefulness. The environment supports literacy, but enjoyment does not follow automatically from availability.


Adults can carry similar associations. Someone who spends the day reviewing contracts, reports, policies or academic material may not experience recreational reading as a meaningful change of pace. Another person may have stopped reading after years of treating every book as something to finish, remember and discuss intelligently.


The issue is not always a lack of interest in ideas. Sometimes reading has become too burdened by the need to perform.



Choice Changes The Experience

Enjoyment becomes more likely when the reader has genuine choice.


This sounds simple, but many people have learned to approach books through obligation. They select what they believe they should read, what others have praised or what appears suitably serious. When the book fails to hold their attention, they blame their concentration rather than questioning whether the material was ever a good match.


A person trying to rediscover reading may begin with an award-winning novel when they would be far more engaged by a memoir, a fast-paced thriller or a book about architecture, food or sport. Someone who enjoys listening to conversations may prefer interviews, essays or audiobooks to long fictional narratives. These are not inferior routes into reading.


Choice also includes permission to stop.


The belief that every book must be completed can turn a disappointing selection into weeks of avoidance. The unfinished book remains beside the bed as a quiet accusation, while reading itself becomes associated with returning to something that has already failed to interest the reader.

Experienced readers often abandon books without concluding that they dislike reading. They assume the match was wrong. Less confident readers may interpret the same experience as evidence that books are not for them.



Libraries can be particularly useful because they reduce the pressure to choose correctly. A person can browse, borrow, sample and return without needing to justify the purchase or complete every title. Singapore’s public-library network makes this kind of experimentation unusually accessible, but the reader still needs permission to use it freely rather than treating every visit as a search for the most improving book.


Reading pleasure develops more easily when curiosity is allowed to lead before discipline is asked to sustain it.



The Phone Is Not The Whole Explanation

Phones have undeniably changed how people use spare moments. Waiting for a train, sitting alone over lunch or resting before sleep once created natural openings for a book. Those gaps are now easily filled by messages, short videos, news alerts and an endless supply of small pieces of novelty.


It is tempting to conclude that people would read more if they simply had greater discipline around screens. Sometimes reducing digital interruption does help. A book struggles to establish momentum when attention is redirected every few minutes.


The comparison is not entirely fair, however. A phone offers immediate stimulation with almost no entry cost. A book may require several pages of orientation before the reader understands the setting, argument or characters. Telling someone to choose the slower reward without considering whether that reward has ever become reliable for them can turn reading into another test of willpower.


Screens also contain a great deal of reading. People may spend hours processing messages, articles, captions, discussions and practical information while feeling unable to begin a novel. The issue is not necessarily that written language has lost its appeal. Fragmented reading and sustained reading place different demands on attention.


A tired person may manage ten short items because each one provides a quick ending. A chapter asks them to hold information, tolerate slower development and remain with a single line of thought. That capacity can weaken through disuse, but it is also affected by stress, sleep and mental load.


For someone juggling long workdays, caregiving, school schedules and the practical demands of Singapore life, the problem may be less a damaged attention span than a mind seeking the easiest available form of rest.


Blaming the phone can therefore obscure the more useful question: what would make sustained reading rewarding enough to compete?



Reading Does Not Always Need To Be Productive

Adults often return to books with an agenda. They want to improve their thinking, understand finance, develop leadership skills or make better use of their time. Reading becomes another component of self-development.


There is nothing wrong with learning intentionally. The problem is that usefulness can crowd out pleasure. A person who already spends much of life trying to become more capable may not want leisure to feel like further instruction.


Fiction, humour, romance, fantasy and familiar rereading can appear indulgent beside books that promise expertise or personal growth. Yet the desire to continue reading often depends on being absorbed rather than improved. A book does not need to transform the reader to justify the time spent with it.


The same principle applies to children. A comic, joke book or heavily illustrated series may develop a more durable relationship with reading than a supposedly enriching title that is repeatedly abandoned. The first task is not always to increase difficulty. It may be to establish that reading can offer something the child actively wants.


Pleasure is not a distraction from reading development. It is one of the forces that makes sustained development possible.


A person may eventually expand into more demanding material once confidence and habit have grown. They may also remain loyal to a particular genre throughout life. Neither outcome determines the seriousness of their mind.


Reading becomes easier to love when it is allowed to be more than evidence that the time was used well.




Different Minds Seek Different Rewards

Reading is sometimes presented as the highest form of quiet leisure, as though people who prefer other activities have simply failed to appreciate its benefits. This overlooks the fact that different minds are restored, stimulated and engaged in different ways.


One person enjoys the inwardness of reading. They can spend hours following another person’s thoughts without needing to respond. Someone else becomes energised through conversation, movement, music, building, cooking or direct experience. They may be equally curious, but their curiosity prefers interaction with people or the physical world.


A person who loves history may still prefer museums, documentaries and conversations with knowledgeable guides to historical books. Someone fascinated by food may learn more eagerly through markets, kitchens and repeated experimentation than through reading recipes. Another person may understand complex ideas best when listening to a discussion rather than processing them alone on a page.


These preferences are not fixed categories. Many people enjoy several forms of learning and leisure, depending on their energy and circumstances. A parent who once read every evening may struggle during years of disrupted sleep and return to books when life becomes less demanding. Someone who disliked reading in school may discover audiobooks during long commutes and later begin borrowing the printed versions.


The mistake is assuming that reading preference reveals the seriousness of someone’s inner life. A person can be reflective without reading novels, imaginative without collecting books and intellectually curious without enjoying long stretches of text.


Books offer a distinctive experience. They do not hold a monopoly on depth.



Audiobooks Still Count

The rise of audiobooks has revived an old argument about what qualifies as reading. Some people regard listening as a lesser substitute because the listener is not decoding printed words. That distinction may matter in a literacy lesson, but it is less useful when the question is how adults engage with stories, arguments and ideas.



Listening allows people to encounter books while travelling, exercising, cooking or completing routine tasks. In Singapore, where daily journeys may involve crowded trains, transfers and walking between transport connections, audio can be more practical than holding a physical book. It can also make longer works feel more approachable for people who struggle to settle into sustained reading after a demanding day.


The experience is not identical. A printed page allows the reader to control pace, reread a sentence and see the structure of an argument. Audio brings voice, rhythm and interpretation, while requiring the listener to retain information without visual reference. Each form has strengths and limitations.


For some people, audiobooks provide the first dependable experience of becoming absorbed in a long narrative. Once they associate books with pleasure rather than effort, they may explore other formats. Others may remain lifelong listeners. There is no reason to treat that outcome as incomplete.


The more important question is whether the person is engaged with the material, not whether the format preserves a particular image of what a reader should look like.



Returning To Reading Without Turning It Into A Test

People who say they want to read more often begin by setting targets. They plan to finish a certain number of books, read every night or replace an hour of screen time with something more worthwhile. The intention is understandable, but the target can recreate the same pressure that made reading unattractive in the first place.


A gentler return begins with reducing friction.


The book should be easy to reach. The subject should create genuine interest. The format should suit the person’s life rather than an idealised routine. Ten minutes during lunch may be more realistic than imagining a quiet hour before bed. A collection of essays may fit fragmented time better than an intricate novel requiring constant continuity.


It also helps to begin below one’s presumed level of seriousness. A gripping mystery, familiar childhood favourite or celebrity memoir may restore reading momentum more effectively than the difficult book someone believes they ought to appreciate. The aim is not to prove intellectual ability. It is to rebuild the connection between opening a book and wanting to continue.


The same principle applies to children. Adults can provide access, model reading and invite conversation without controlling every choice. A child who repeatedly borrows books about the same game, animal or fictional world may be building confidence, vocabulary and ownership through repetition. Constantly directing them towards more worthy material can interrupt the very attachment adults are trying to encourage.



A reading habit becomes stronger when it contains enough freedom to remain voluntary.



When Reading Remains Unusually Difficult

A persistent dislike of reading does not automatically indicate a problem. People are allowed to prefer other forms of leisure and learning. There are, however, situations in which the difficulty deserves greater attention.


A child or adult may avoid reading because words appear to move, lines are frequently lost or decoding remains exhausting despite practice. They may understand complex ideas when heard but struggle disproportionately when the same information is presented in writing. Headaches, visual discomfort, attention difficulties or anxiety around reading may also shape the experience.


These patterns should not be reduced to laziness. Appropriate educational, vision or professional assessment may help identify whether a learning difference, language issue or other barrier is involved. The purpose is not to force the person into becoming an enthusiastic reader. It is to ensure that an unseen difficulty does not unnecessarily restrict education, confidence or access to information.


Support can also be practical rather than clinical. Larger text, clearer layouts, shorter sections, audiobooks and text-to-speech tools may reduce friction. A student who understands better through discussion may benefit from talking through the material before returning to the page.


Reading matters because it provides access to much of modern life. Enjoying novels is optional. Being able to obtain information, understand instructions and participate confidently should not depend on pretending that every reader experiences text in the same way.



Loving Books Is One Relationship With The World

People who love reading often struggle to explain the pleasure to those who do not. A book can create companionship without social demand, movement without travel and intimacy with people who may have lived in another century. It can slow the world enough for one idea, voice or life to receive sustained attention.


Those rewards are real. They are not universal.


Another person may find the same absorption through gardening, conversation, dance, repairing an object or walking through an unfamiliar neighbourhood. They are not necessarily avoiding reflection. They may reach it through a different door.


The value of reading should not depend on turning readers into a superior category of person. Books are better defended as one of the many ways human beings explore experience, develop language and encounter minds beyond their immediate circle.


Some people fall in love with reading early. Others arrive through the right subject, format or stage of life. Some maintain a respectful distance from books while remaining deeply engaged with ideas, people and the world around them.


The useful question is not whether someone deserves to be called a reader.


It is whether they have had a fair chance to discover what reading might offer them, without being judged for the form that discovery takes.



Comments


bottom of page